Time and time again, I try to rationalize the invention of Smart TAG as one of our toll payments method. In the end, I still think that it is a redundant invention. I still think that Touch N Go is the only way to go.
For a Smart TAG to work, these are the things required:
- your Touch N Go card must have adequate balance
- battery power for the device must be adequate
- the device must be flashed in the right direction i.e the black face facing the scanner
- tint film of your car must not be V-kool or equivalent. Your Smart TAG can't be detected through this type of film
- adequate balance in your card
Some might argue that with increasing Touch N Go users, queue at the lanes are getting longer compared to Smart TAG lanes. I've actually figured out why this happen. Go to any big toll plazas, you will either see the same or more numbers of Smart TAG lanes compared to Touch N Go lanes. This certainly does not makes sense since I think Touch N Go users are many times more compared to Smart TAG users. While it is undeniable that Smart TAG users do pay a premium for its service, is it fair at the expense of Touch N Go users when the main purpose of these two methods are to simplify and fasten toll payments?
While correct use of Smart TAG will generally smooth the traffic flow, but there are too many factors that could affect its flow. Use of Touch N Go will greatly reduce the need of human presence. Besides, what is 5 seconds faster when on other hand, you can actually eliminate the uncertainty elements in its use?
No comments:
Post a Comment